Remember in my last post on election administration, when I suggested that attitudes need to change? Here's exhibit A:

Making election day a weekend day (presumably a Saturday, since there would certainly be a fuss if it were moved to a Sunday) might not have that much of an effect on total turnout.

And anyway, as Bryan Caplan points out, sometimes having fewer people vote isn’t such a bad thing.  (Bolding is mine) 

Peter Suderman is a smart conservative, not part of the Limbaugh-Malkin axis of crazy.  And this isn't a piece that he spent a lot of thought on, especially the last sentence--it's a "here's an idea, I'll just sort of throw it out there" post.  But look what it reveals.  Even if Saturday voting would lead to higher turnout, Suderman says, no big deal--after all, who really cares about whether or not people can vote? Voter suppression--albeit indirectly, through methods like making voting more inconvenient--is intellectually justifiable on the right.  It's bad enough to have intelligent libertarians and conservatives argue that less-informed or less-well-educated people shouldn't vote--this at least has a justification, albeit a sick and twisted one.  But is there a coherent argument for making voting less convenient that doesn't boil down to "I don't like the way those people vote"?